NLRB Rejects Union Bid to Split Locations From an Existing National Unit

A regional director for the National Labor Relations Board’s Chicago office has dismissed a union’s petition to represent a group of employees at an Indiana-based transportation company. The proposed unit covered only a subset of locations already part of a nationwide bargaining unit represented by another union. The decision is a reminder that the scope of a bargaining unit matters as much as the question of whether workers want representation.

What the Petition Sought

The union asked the board to certify a unit limited to some of the company’s locations. The regional director found that those locations were already included in a larger national unit represented by a different union. Because the proposed unit would carve out part of an existing unit, the petition could not proceed as filed. The ruling turned on how the petitioned-for group related to the unit already in place, not on the merits of the union’s organizing effort.

Why Unit Structure Matters

Bargaining units determine which employees a union represents and which contract covers them. When multi-location employers have national or regional units, the board generally looks at whether a new petition would fragment an existing bargaining relationship. Overlapping or partial units can create competing representation claims and make it harder for an employer to bargain a single, coherent contract. For employers in logistics and transportation, where operations often span many facilities, unit lines can have significant practical effects.

Practical Points for Multi-Location Employers

  • Map each facility to any existing bargaining unit before responding to a representation petition
  • Review contract recognition clauses for language describing covered locations
  • Coordinate with counsel early when a petition could affect multiple sites
  • Track the status of national or regional units that cover your operations
  • Document how each location’s workforce is classified and assigned

Employers should not assume that a petition covering only some locations will necessarily succeed or fail. The outcome depends on how the proposed group fits within existing representation rights. Employers in transportation and warehousing benefit from understanding unit boundaries before a campaign begins, because those boundaries often decide which union, and which contract, governs a given workforce.

Employers involved in a representation petition should also consider how the outcome affects future bargaining. Once a unit is defined, changing its boundaries can take additional proceedings, and a contract negotiated for one group may not extend cleanly to another. Early analysis of the existing unit structure can prevent costly disagreements later in the process.

For further details, please contact the lawyers at Tobia & Lovelace Esq., LLC at 201-638-0990.