In his short time as acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), William Cowen has stood out for adopting an unusually proactive approach. Rather than operating quietly behind the scenes, Cowen has issued public memoranda, policy updates, and enforcement guidance at a pace that labor experts say is uncommon for the role.
The general counsel typically functions more as an internal strategist, but Cowen has chosen to use the position as a platform to shape public understanding of the board’s priorities and direction. His activity has not gone unnoticed; both unions and employers are closely monitoring his every move to anticipate where labor law enforcement may head in the near term.
Why His Approach Stands Out
Cowen’s aggressive public stance reflects the unique moment the NLRB is facing. The agency is currently under heavy political scrutiny, with multiple lawsuits questioning its constitutionality and the independence of its administrative law judges. Additionally, a backlog of cases and limited staffing have left the NLRB vulnerable to criticism. By speaking out and signaling strong enforcement priorities, Cowen is attempting to project stability, ensure the agency remains credible, and prevent stakeholders from doubting the board’s authority.
For example, his memoranda have addressed union organizing protections, employer retaliation, and the limits of executive discretion. This level of transparency from an acting general counsel is rare, and it demonstrates Cowen’s intent to keep the NLRB relevant during a period of transition and uncertainty.
Impact on Workers and Employers
For workers and unions, Cowen’s approach provides an unusual level of clarity. By publicly outlining which cases and violations his office intends to prioritize, unions can better prepare their strategies for defending members and filing claims. This has created a sense of renewed confidence in the agency’s willingness to safeguard labor rights. Employers, however, may see Cowen’s activism as a warning sign. The increased communication suggests that enforcement actions could become more frequent and more aggressive. Companies may need to scrutinize their labor practices more carefully to avoid becoming the subject of heightened scrutiny.
Ultimately, Cowen’s tenure illustrates just how much influence even an interim official can wield in shaping the national labor agenda when the agency is under the microscope.
For further details, please contact the lawyers at Tobia & Lovelace Esq., LLC at 201-638-0990.